Loading
Loading

Apolo Editorial Team
Apolo Lawyers Editorial Desk
Dispute Resolution in Vietnam: Litigation vs Arbitration vs Mediation
Introduction
When a commercial dispute arises in Vietnam, parties have three primary resolution paths. Choosing the right method can save millions in costs and months in time. Attorney Vo Thien Hien has represented clients across all three forums and offers this comparative guide.
Court Litigation
Process
File lawsuit at the competent People's CourtCourt-led mediation attempt (mandatory)First-instance trial (3-6 months after filing)Appeal (if either party disagrees)Enforcement of judgment
Advantages
Binding and enforceable decisionsAbility to apply interim measuresLower filing fees than arbitrationPublic precedent value
Disadvantages
Slow: 12-24 months for final resolutionPublic proceedings (no confidentiality)Judges may lack commercial expertiseMultiple appeal levelsEnforcement of foreign judgments is difficult
Best For
Domestic disputes with clear legal precedentCases requiring injunctive reliefLower-value disputesCases where one party won't agree to arbitration
Commercial Arbitration
Process
File request for arbitration (VIAC or other institution)Tribunal constitution (each party selects one arbitrator)Exchange of submissions and evidenceOral hearingFinal award (binding, no appeal on merits)
Leading Institutions
VIAC (Vietnam International Arbitration Centre): Most popular in VietnamSIAC (Singapore): Popular for cross-border disputes involving VietnamICC (Paris): For large international transactions
Advantages
Faster: typically 6-12 monthsConfidential proceedingsArbitrators with industry expertiseAwards enforceable internationally (New York Convention)Flexible procedures
Disadvantages
Higher costs (arbitrator fees + institutional fees)Requires prior agreement (arbitration clause)Limited grounds for setting aside awardsNo appeal on merits
Best For
International commercial disputesHigh-value B2B disputesCases requiring confidentialityDisputes needing specialized expertise
Mediation
Process
Parties agree to mediateSelect a mediator (independent or institutional)Joint and separate sessionsIf successful: settlement agreement (enforceable if court-recognized)If unsuccessful: parties retain right to litigate/arbitrate
Advantages
Fastest: weeks to monthsLowest costPreserves business relationshipsParties control the outcomeCourt recognition available
Disadvantages
Non-binding (unless court-recognized)Requires good faith from both partiesNo precedent valueCannot compel attendance
Best For
Ongoing business relationshipsDisputes with potential for compromiseMulti-party disputesFamily business succession issues
Cost Comparison
| Method | Filing Fee | Duration | Total Cost Estimate | |--------|-----------|----------|-------------------| | Litigation | 0.5-3% of claim value | 12-24 months | $5,000-50,000 | | Arbitration (VIAC) | Based on claim value | 6-12 months | $15,000-100,000+ | | Mediation | Negotiable | 1-3 months | $2,000-15,000 |
Practical Tips
Include a dispute resolution clause in every contractConsider multi-tier clauses: negotiate → mediate → arbitrateChoose the governing law carefully (Vietnamese law is mandatory for some matters)Preserve evidence from day oneEngage counsel early — prevention is cheaper than cure
Conclusion
There is no one-size-fits-all approach. The best dispute resolution method depends on the nature of the dispute, the relationship between parties, and the desired outcome.
Contact Attorney Vo Thien Hien at Apolo Lawyers for strategic advice on dispute resolution in Vietnam.
Share
Apolo Editorial Team
Apolo Lawyers Editorial Desk
Authored by the Apolo Lawyers editorial team — senior associates and content specialists — with legal content reviewed by Managing Partner Vo Thien Hien before publication.